Scammers operate by constructing false profiles on dating sites, cultivating relationships with potential victims, before attempting to extract money from them.
Furthermore, scammers sometimes steal the identities of other people who have internet or social networking profiles, and use these stolen identities in their fake dating profiles in order to appear more attractive or appealing.
Other Factors Predicting Likelihood of Being Scammed In addition to the psychological factors outlined above, this study also found that age predicted vulnerability to being scammed, with middle aged people more likely to be the victims of scamming than younger or older people. Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims’ Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking.
More specifically, 21% of victims were younger, (aged 18-34), 63% middle aged (aged 35-54) with 16% being older (aged 55 or over). If you need to check on your partner’s sincerity,employee’s honesty,recover your email passwords, Social networks *Institutional servers-keylogging -*University grades changing / Admin(staff) *Account hack -Access/Password *Credit score increase *Facebook, instagram, bbm, Skype, snapchat,zoosk, *Various blogs, icloud, apple accounts etc *Clearing of criminal records- *Email accounts hack ( gmail,yahoo mail,hotmail )*Databases hack- Untraceable IP *Change your school grades, *Gain access to bank accounts.
It could be that less kind individuals have fewer social networks (presumably as a result of being less kind), and therefore focus more of their time on the fake relationship created by scammers and thus fall victim.
In addition to the promise of a great relationship, the victims of romance scams are often promised wealth.
A recent study by Monica Whitty, examined several psychological characteristics which she suggested might be important in predicting whether someone may be likely to fall victim to being scammed.
One of the tactics employed by the scammer is the creation of a sense of urgency to respond to their request (e.g.In fact, the opposite was the case with better educated people more likely to be scammed. Previous research by Fisher, Lea and Evans (2013) suggested that overconfidence may cause people to be more vulnerable and therefore it may be the case that better educated individuals are confident that they can identify a scam whereas in reality they cannot. However, in the current study, a person’s level of greed or their perception of their own trustworthiness did not predict their susceptibility to being scammed.Similarly, there was no difference of likelihood of being scammed between people with an internal or external locus of control.